Nikkor AF-S 300mm f/4D IF-ED - Review / Test Report - Analysis
Lens Reviews - Nikon / Nikkor (APS-C)


The naked AF 300mm f/4D IF-ED produces an insignificant degree of distortion only measurable under lab conditions. Adding tele-converters does merely affect this base characteristic.

Move the mouse cursor over the focal length text marks below to observe the respective distortions
300mm 300mm + AF-S 1.4x 300mm + AF 1.7x DG (third-party)

The chart above has a real-world size of about 120x80cm.


The AF-S 300mm f/4 is a full frame lens so it can take advantage of a sweet spot behavior on the D200. Vignetting is detectable at f/4 (0.4EV) but it shouldn't be overly field-relevant. At f/5.6 vignetting is absolutely negligible. There's even less vignetting at wide-open aperture when adding a Nikkor AF-S 1.4x or a third-party (Soligor) AF 1.7x DG converter.

MTF (resolution)

The AF-S 300mm f/4D IF-ED produced very-good to excellent resolution figures under lab conditions. The performance at f/4 is already great in the center of the image. The borders follow on a very good level at this setting. The peak performance is reached at f/8 with an increase in quality primarily at the borders.

Adding a tele-converter always comes at cost of a performance penalty but with the Nikkor AF-S 1.4x the decrease in quality remains relatively moderate. Nonetheless the resolution figure are only good (borders) to very-good (center) at f/4. Stopping down helps to lift the quality especially at the borders.

The Soligor AF 1.7x DG is a third-party converter (probably a Kenko clone) which pushes the limits a little more (~510mm f/6.7). However, at wide-open aperture the resulting border quality is quite poor. At f/9.5 (f/8 is displayed in the viewfinder) the quality is pretty decent though.

Please note that the MTF results are not directly comparable across the different systems!

Below is a simplified summary of the formal findings. The chart shows line widths per picture height (LW/PH) which can be taken as a measure for sharpness. If you want to know more about the MTF50 figures you may check out the corresponding Imatest Explanations

Chromatic Aberrations (CAs)

CAs (color shadows at harsh contrast transitions) are pretty well controlled with an average CA pixel width of less than 1px at the borders. The converters magnify CAs but the situation remains pretty acceptable. Purple fringing doesn't seem to be an issue with this lens.